We Care...!!!

CHENNAI: The Madras excessive court docket has requested as to why a director-general of police-rank officer, accused of sexually harassing a girl IPS officer, has not been suspended but whereas an SP, who allegedly blocked the lady officer’s automobile, has been suspended. It has referred to as for a standing report by March 16.
“The SP was solely an arrow, the (then) particular DGP was the bow. But the arrow has been suspended, not the bow. Is the (then) particular DGP so highly effective that the state can’t droop him?” Justice N Anand Venkatesh requested public prosecutor A Natarajan on Friday.
The choose made the statement whereas listening to a suo motu plea initiated by him taking cognizance of the woman-SP’s criticism of sexual harassment meted out to her by the then particular DGP, who has since been faraway from the submit and saved with none accountability now.
Noting that the court docket would be sure that the probe was intently monitored, Justice Anand Venkatesh directed the prosecutor to file a standing report on the investigation by March 16.
The court docket additionally refused to vacate the prohibition in opposition to publicising the title of the accused along with the sufferer. “The court did not want a parallel media trial to happen in this case,” the choose stated.
Advocate Abdul Saleem, representing the DGP, submitted that whereas the accused officer was cooperating with the investigation and had filed his submission earlier than the interior complaints committee (ICC), a committee member had brazenly commented on WhatsApp that the accused must be hanged with out trial. The remark was made even earlier than the proceedings began, he stated.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Translate »