Shopian encounter Police chargesheet says Army captain 2 others attempted
We Care...!!!

SHOPIAN: The Army captain concerned within the pretend encounter in Kashmir’s Shopian district final July and two different civilian accused have not supplied any details about the supply of weapons planted on the three slain youths and had additionally tried to destroy the proof, a police cost sheet stated.
Captain Bhoopendra Singh had additionally supplied incorrect data to his superiors and the police concerning the restoration made through the staged encounter, the cost sheet filed by the Special Investigation Team (SIT) of the Jammu and Kashmir Police earlier than the chief judicial Justice of the Peace right here stated.
The case pertains to the July 18, 2020 encounter in Shopian’s Amshipura during which three youths had been killed and dubbed as terrorists. Later, the Army ordered a Court of Inquiry after reviews appeared on social media that the three youths had been harmless.
“No leads regarding the source of illegal weapons as illegally arranged by accused” for planting on the our bodies had been supplied, the cost sheet stated.
“By staging the encounter,” the three accused “have purposefully destroyed evidence or real crime that they have committed and also have (been) purposefully projecting false information as part of a criminal conspiracy hatched between them with the motive to grab a prize money of Rs 20 lakh,” it stated.
The Army, nevertheless, had denied that its captain staged the encounter for Rs 20 lakh, saying there was no system of money rewards for its personnel for any acts in fight conditions or in any other case within the line of responsibility.
“The evidence was destroyed by accused Captain Singh,” the cost sheet stated.
Singh, who has been positioned underneath detention, together with the opposite two accused — Tabish Nazir and Bilal Ahmed Lone — set hearth to a shelter on the encounter website, in line with the cost sheet.
The accused captain was in contact with Fayaz Ahmed, a particular police officer (SPO) posted with the Special Operations Group, by two cellular numbers registered within the title of civilians.
Ahmed, who’s listed as a witness on this case, was approached by Singh for arranging weapons. A resident of Poonch in Jammu area, Ahmed gave his assertion underneath Section 164 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) earlier than a Justice of the Peace.
The SIT cost sheet gave particulars of forensic evaluation of the crime scene which was photographed “from all possible perspectives”. The FSL (Forensic and Scientific Laboratory) workforce recovered very important proof that was seized.
Based on responses filed by 62 Rashtriya Rifles to the SIT about particulars of the ammunition fired through the incident together with a replica of SITREP (Situation Report), the “accused captain had claimed to have (sic) fired a total of 37 rounds from his service rifle”.
The Army, in its FIR registered at Heerpora police station, had claimed that based mostly on “their own input about hiding of unknown terrorists in village Amshipora”, the encounter was launched on July 17, 2020 throughout which three unidentified hardcore terrorists had been neutralised.
Two pistols with two magazines and 4 empty pistol cartridges, 15 dwell cartridges and 15 empty cartridges of AK sequence weapon and different objectionable gadgets had been recovered from the encounter website.
However, through the ballistic and forensic examination of the scene of crime, 4 empty cartridges had been recovered — two of which had been from 7.65 mm and two from 9 mm pistols (utilized by the Army).
“The seized fifteen 7.62×39 mm rifle cartridge circumstances (utilized in AK rifles) had been discovered to have been fired from greater than 4 firearms.
“From the circumstances on the crime scene that are opposite to the findings of the ballistic skilled opinion the model of the accused captain Bhoopendra Singh… concerning data furnished by him in FIR isn’t supported.”
There was no seizure of AK rifles from the staged encounter.
The Army, which has additionally accomplished its Court of Inquiry and Summary of Evidence, had discovered “prima facie” evidence that troops had “exceeded” powers underneath the Armed Forces Special Powers Act (AFSPA) through the encounter during which the three youths had been killed.
Following this, the Army had initiated disciplinary proceedings.
The three youths killed in Amshipura had been Imtiyaz Ahmed, Abrar Ahmed and Mohammed Ibrar, all hailing from Rajouri district. Their identities had been subsequently confirmed by a DNA take a look at and the our bodies had been handed over to their households in Baramulla in October final 12 months.
The cost sheet stated the Army captain had taken a personal automobile on the day of the encounter.
Aijaz Ahmed Lone, the automobile proprietor, gave a press release underneath oath earlier than a Justice of the Peace that Army personnel had approached him at his residence on July 17 final 12 months and brought his automobile.
Subsequently, on the day of the encounter, the Army knowledgeable him that his automobile was stationed at Amshipura Nar “in a defective situation”.
General Officer in Command of XV Corps Lt Gen B S Raju had stated earlier that the Summary of Evidence had been accomplished and the Army will take the subsequent plan of action as per the regulation.
Officials within the know of the event stated Singh might face a Court Martial continuing for violating the powers vested underneath the AFSPA and never following the dos and don’ts of the Chief of Army Staff as authorised by the Supreme Court.
The cost sheet submitted by the SIT has listed 75 witnesses in assist of its findings and has additionally supplied technical proof together with name information data of the accused individuals.

Report

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Translate »